ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH vs ANMOL RATAN S/O DAULAT RAM — 96/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010053762025
Filing Number
382/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
96/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH
Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ANMOL RATAN S/O DAULAT RAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
RENT CONTROL APPEAL NO. 96/2025: ALOK MITTAL v. ANMOL RATAN Summary The court partially allowed the appellant's (Alok Mittal) rent control appeal, setting aside the rent controller's order dated 29.03.2025. The court held that the tenant (respondent Anmol Ratan) must pay ₹6,500/month (including GST, municipal taxes, and other charges) from the order date, with future increases in accordance with the UP Urban Property Tenancy Regulation Act 2021, rather than the 7% annual increase previously ordered. The tenant was directed to execute a written lease agreement within three months at the appellant's expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
21-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
01-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
03-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
04-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Apr-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 96/2025
RENT CONTROL APPEAL NO. 96/2025: ALOK MITTAL v. ANMOL RATAN Summary The court partially allowed the appellant's (Alok Mittal) rent control appeal, setting aside the rent controller's order dated 29.03.2025. The court held that the tenant (respondent Anmol Ratan) must pay ₹6,500/month (including GST, municipal taxes, and other charges) from the order date, with future increases in accordance with the UP Urban Property Tenancy Regulation Act 2021, rather than the 7% annual increase previously ordered. The tenant was directed to execute a written lease agreement within three months at the appellant's expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts