ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH vs SEEMA MITTAL W/O PRAVESH KUMAR MITTAL — 81/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010053742025
Filing Number
380/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
81/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH
Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SEEMA MITTAL W/O PRAVESH KUMAR MITTAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 81/2025 - Alok Mittal v. Seema Mittal Court Decision: The Additional District Judge (Administration), Saharanpur partially allowed the appellant's rent control appeal. The court set aside the rent authority's order directing 7% annual increase under the UP Urban Property (Leasing) Regulation Act 2021, and instead fixed fair market-based rent at ₹5,500/month per shop. The appellant was awarded ₹50,000/month compensation from the date the eviction notice was issued until actual possession is recovered. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent tenant failed to register a lease deed under the new 2021 Act despite multiple notices and opportunities, thereby losing statutory protection. Since the property predates the 2021 Act's applicability and the parties had an oral agreement, market valuation became relevant. Evidence from nearby comparable shops showed prevailing market rents significantly exceeded ₹3,400/month that the tenant was paying, justifying the higher ₹5,500/month rate with GST and municipal taxes payable by the tenant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
21-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
01-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
03-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
04-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Apr-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 81/2025
Case Summary: 81/2025 - Alok Mittal v. Seema Mittal Court Decision: The Additional District Judge (Administration), Saharanpur partially allowed the appellant's rent control appeal. The court set aside the rent authority's order directing 7% annual increase under the UP Urban Property (Leasing) Regulation Act 2021, and instead fixed fair market-based rent at ₹5,500/month per shop. The appellant was awarded ₹50,000/month compensation from the date the eviction notice was issued until actual possession is recovered. Key Reasoning: The court found that the respondent tenant failed to register a lease deed under the new 2021 Act despite multiple notices and opportunities, thereby losing statutory protection. Since the property predates the 2021 Act's applicability and the parties had an oral agreement, market valuation became relevant. Evidence from nearby comparable shops showed prevailing market rents significantly exceeded ₹3,400/month that the tenant was paying, justifying the higher ₹5,500/month rate with GST and municipal taxes payable by the tenant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts