ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH MITTAL vs PRAMOD KUMAR AHUJA S/O DESRAJ AHUJA — 82/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010053732025
Filing Number
379/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
82/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH MITTAL
Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAMOD KUMAR AHUJA S/O DESRAJ AHUJA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court partially allowed the Rent Control Appeal by Alok Mittal against Pramod Kumar Ahuja regarding a shop in GP Shopping Complex, Saharranpur. The court set aside the order directing 7% annual rent increase and instead fixed the rent at ₹6,500/month with GST and municipal taxes payable by the tenant, while allowing prospective rent increases in accordance with law. The court found the tenant's failure to register a written tenancy deed under the new 2021 Act did not warrant eviction, as the landlord had not properly notified the tenant to register one within statutory timeframes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
21-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
01-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
03-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
04-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Apr-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 82/2025
Summary The court partially allowed the Rent Control Appeal by Alok Mittal against Pramod Kumar Ahuja regarding a shop in GP Shopping Complex, Saharranpur. The court set aside the order directing 7% annual rent increase and instead fixed the rent at ₹6,500/month with GST and municipal taxes payable by the tenant, while allowing prospective rent increases in accordance with law. The court found the tenant's failure to register a written tenancy deed under the new 2021 Act did not warrant eviction, as the landlord had not properly notified the tenant to register one within statutory timeframes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts