ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH MITTAL vs MANOJ KUMAR MITTAL S/O MAMCHAND — 83/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010053722025
Filing Number
378/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
83/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH MITTAL
Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR MITTAL S/O MAMCHAND
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 83/2025 Summary: ALOK MITTAL v. MANOJ KUMAR MITTAL The Additional District Judge partially allowed the tenant's (Alok Mittal's) rent control appeal, setting aside the rent authority's order directing 7% annual rent increase under the new UP Urban Property Rental Act 2021. The court found the respondent-landlord failed to register a written tenancy agreement as mandated by law, making the tenant not liable for eviction. The court fixed the fair market-based rent at ₹5,500/month with taxes, rejecting both the tenant's claim for ₹50,000/month maintenance and the authority's 7% increase formula, while directing tenant to execute a registered lease agreement within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
21-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
01-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
03-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
04-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Apr-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 83/2025
Case 83/2025 Summary: ALOK MITTAL v. MANOJ KUMAR MITTAL The Additional District Judge partially allowed the tenant's (Alok Mittal's) rent control appeal, setting aside the rent authority's order directing 7% annual rent increase under the new UP Urban Property Rental Act 2021. The court found the respondent-landlord failed to register a written tenancy agreement as mandated by law, making the tenant not liable for eviction. The court fixed the fair market-based rent at ₹5,500/month with taxes, rejecting both the tenant's claim for ₹50,000/month maintenance and the authority's 7% increase formula, while directing tenant to execute a registered lease agreement within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts