KHUSHAL SINGH S/O AMAR SINGH vs SUMAN VARMA W/O RAVINDER KUMAR VERMA — 49/2024
Case under Rent Recovery Act Section 35. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 06th May 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010037672024
Filing Number
207/2024
Filing Date
20-Mar-2024
Registration No
49/2024
Registration Date
21-Mar-2024
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KHUSHAL SINGH S/O AMAR SINGH
Adv. MR. SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUMAN VARMA W/O RAVINDER KUMAR VERMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 49/2024 Khushal Singh v. Suman Varma The Rent Control Authority allowed the tenant-appellant's rent control appeal against the dismissal of his petition for cross-examination of the landlord's witness. The court found that the lower authority erroneously rejected the tenant's request for cross-examination without legal justification, violating Section 33(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Property (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Act, 2021, which mandates that witness evidence be given through affidavit with provision for examination and cross-examination when necessary for justice. The judgment was set aside and the case remanded for proper proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
30-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Apr-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Mar-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
07-Feb-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Jan-2026
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Dec-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Dec-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Nov-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Oct-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Oct-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
14-Oct-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Sep-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Sep-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Aug-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Aug-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Jul-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-May-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Apr-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
07-Apr-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Mar-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
11-Mar-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
30-Jan-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Jan-2025
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Dec-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Nov-2024
Arguments
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Nov-2024
Arguments
District Judge
-
06-Nov-2024
For Order
District Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
hearing
District Judge
-
18-Oct-2024
hearing
District Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
hearing
District Judge
-
12-Aug-2024
hearing
District Judge
-
11-Jul-2024
hearing
District Judge
-
21-May-2024
hearing
District Judge
-
30-Apr-2024
hearing
District Judge
-
21-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 49/2024
Case Summary: 49/2024 Khushal Singh v. Suman Varma The Rent Control Authority allowed the tenant-appellant's rent control appeal against the dismissal of his petition for cross-examination of the landlord's witness. The court found that the lower authority erroneously rejected the tenant's request for cross-examination without legal justification, violating Section 33(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Urban Property (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Act, 2021, which mandates that witness evidence be given through affidavit with provision for examination and cross-examination when necessary for justice. The judgment was set aside and the case remanded for proper proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts