SHAMSHAD URF BHURA vs State of U.P. — 1080/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),337,336(3),340(2),338,341. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 02nd April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSP010032492026
Filing Number
2982/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
1080/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.5
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
FIR Details
FIR Number
39
Police Station
JANAK PURI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHAMSHAD URF BHURA
Adv. MUKEEM KHAN
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.5
Disposed
hearing
hearing
hearing
hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-03-2026 | hearing |
| 30-03-2026 | hearing |
| 24-03-2026 | hearing |
| 19-03-2026 | hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
CASE SUMMARY: 1080/2026 - Shamshad URF Bhura v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Shamshad URF Bhura, who was charged under IPC Sections 318(4), 337, 336(3), 340(2), 338, 341 and the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 2005, Section 3/7(1). The prosecution alleged that the applicant, in conspiracy with co-accused, committed forgery and misrepresentation by creating fake official orders falsely bearing the seal and signature of the President of India to facilitate the premature release of a prisoner. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of guilt in the charge sheet and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offense involving misuse of national symbols and fraudulent impersonation of government authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: 1080/2026 - Shamshad URF Bhura v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Shamshad URF Bhura, who was charged under IPC Sections 318(4), 337, 336(3), 340(2), 338, 341 and the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 2005, Section 3/7(1). The prosecution alleged that the applicant, in conspiracy with co-accused, committed forgery and misrepresentation by creating fake official orders falsely bearing the seal and signature of the President of India to facilitate the premature release of a prisoner. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of guilt in the charge sheet and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offense involving misuse of national symbols and fraudulent impersonation of government authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts