SHAMSHAD URF BHURA vs State of U.P. — 1080/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),337,336(3),340(2),338,341. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 02nd April 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010032492026

Case disposed

Filing Number

2982/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

1080/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.5

Decision Date

02nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Rejected

FIR Details

FIR Number

39

Police Station

JANAK PURI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),337,336(3),340(2),338,341

Petitioner(s)

SHAMSHAD URF BHURA

Adv. MUKEEM KHAN

Respondent(s)

State of U.P.

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.5

02-04-2026

Disposed

31-03-2026

hearing

30-03-2026

hearing

24-03-2026

hearing

19-03-2026

hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

02-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

CASE SUMMARY: 1080/2026 - Shamshad URF Bhura v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Shamshad URF Bhura, who was charged under IPC Sections 318(4), 337, 336(3), 340(2), 338, 341 and the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 2005, Section 3/7(1). The prosecution alleged that the applicant, in conspiracy with co-accused, committed forgery and misrepresentation by creating fake official orders falsely bearing the seal and signature of the President of India to facilitate the premature release of a prisoner. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of guilt in the charge sheet and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offense involving misuse of national symbols and fraudulent impersonation of government authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: 1080/2026 - Shamshad URF Bhura v. State of U.P. The Additional Sessions Judge rejected the bail application of Shamshad URF Bhura, who was charged under IPC Sections 318(4), 337, 336(3), 340(2), 338, 341 and the Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act 2005, Section 3/7(1). The prosecution alleged that the applicant, in conspiracy with co-accused, committed forgery and misrepresentation by creating fake official orders falsely bearing the seal and signature of the President of India to facilitate the premature release of a prisoner. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of guilt in the charge sheet and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offense involving misuse of national symbols and fraudulent impersonation of government authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case