ANEES vs State of U.P. — 1060/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 190,191(2),191(3),115(2),352,351(2),333,109(1),118(1). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 24th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSP010032472026
Filing Number
2980/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
1060/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
FIR Details
FIR Number
56
Police Station
BARGAON
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ANEES
Adv. DGC
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
hearing
hearing
hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-03-2026 | hearing |
| 17-03-2026 | hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1060/2026 - ANEES v. State of U.P. Decision: The court GRANTED bail to petitioner ANEES. The accused was charged under IPC sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 333, 115(2), 352, 118(1), 109(1), and 351(3) following an FIR relating to a violent incident on 05.03.2026 where multiple persons allegedly obstructed a path, assaulted the complainant's uncle, and attacked family members with weapons, causing grievous injuries. Reasoning: The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering that: (1) the accused has no criminal history; (2) he is an impoverished laborer; (3) medical evidence showed injuries were of "simple" nature contrary to serious allegations; (4) the accused has been in custody since 07.03.2026; and (5) the FIR was filed with substantial delay without adequate explanation. The bail was granted on conditions including personal bond of ₹40,000 with a surety and undertakings to appear at hearings and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1060/2026 - ANEES v. State of U.P. Decision: The court GRANTED bail to petitioner ANEES. The accused was charged under IPC sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 333, 115(2), 352, 118(1), 109(1), and 351(3) following an FIR relating to a violent incident on 05.03.2026 where multiple persons allegedly obstructed a path, assaulted the complainant's uncle, and attacked family members with weapons, causing grievous injuries. Reasoning: The court found sufficient grounds for bail considering that: (1) the accused has no criminal history; (2) he is an impoverished laborer; (3) medical evidence showed injuries were of "simple" nature contrary to serious allegations; (4) the accused has been in custody since 07.03.2026; and (5) the FIR was filed with substantial delay without adequate explanation. The bail was granted on conditions including personal bond of ₹40,000 with a surety and undertakings to appear at hearings and not intimidate witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts