NASIR vs State of U.P. — 1062/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 24th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSP010032452026
Filing Number
2978/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
1062/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
174
Police Station
DEOBAND
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NASIR
Adv. DGC
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Nasir v. State of U.P. (Case 1062/2026) The Sessions Court, Saharanpur granted bail to petitioner Nasir, who was arrested on March 10, 2026, on charges under IPC Section 109(1) and Arms Act Sections 3/25/27. The court found insufficient independent evidence linking the petitioner to alleged firearms recovered during a police encounter on March 9, 2026, and noted no corroborating witnesses to the arrest or seizure. Nasir was released on bail of ₹40,000 personal bond with a surety, subject to conditions including court appearance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
hearing
District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1062/2026
Case Summary: Nasir v. State of U.P. (Case 1062/2026) The Sessions Court, Saharanpur granted bail to petitioner Nasir, who was arrested on March 10, 2026, on charges under IPC Section 109(1) and Arms Act Sections 3/25/27. The court found insufficient independent evidence linking the petitioner to alleged firearms recovered during a police encounter on March 9, 2026, and noted no corroborating witnesses to the arrest or seizure. Nasir was released on bail of ₹40,000 personal bond with a surety, subject to conditions including court appearance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts