ASHU URF AAS MOHAMAD vs State of U.P. — 1065/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSP010032412026
Filing Number
2974/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
1065/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
FIR Details
FIR Number
157
Police Station
DEOBAND
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASHU URF AAS MOHAMAD
Adv. DGC
Respondent(s)
State of U.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1065/2026 - Ashu Urf Aas Mohamad v. State of U.P. The court granted bail to the petitioner, Ashu Urf Aas Mohamad, who was accused under IPC Section 109(1) and Arms Act Sections 3/25/27 for allegedly firing on police with intent to cause death during a March 3, 2026 encounter in Saharanpur. The court found insufficient independent evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged weapons seizure, no confirmed injury to any police officer, and noted the petitioner had been in judicial custody since March 4, 2026. Bail was approved on personal bond of ₹40,000 with a surety, subject to conditions including appearance at all hearings and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1065/2026 - Ashu Urf Aas Mohamad v. State of U.P. The court granted bail to the petitioner, Ashu Urf Aas Mohamad, who was accused under IPC Section 109(1) and Arms Act Sections 3/25/27 for allegedly firing on police with intent to cause death during a March 3, 2026 encounter in Saharanpur. The court found insufficient independent evidence linking the petitioner to the alleged weapons seizure, no confirmed injury to any police officer, and noted the petitioner had been in judicial custody since March 4, 2026. Bail was approved on personal bond of ₹40,000 with a surety, subject to conditions including appearance at all hearings and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts