PARMAL vs State of U.P. — 1067/2026

Case Summary: PARMAL v. State of U.P. (1067/2026) The court rejected Parmal's anticipatory bail petition in a land transaction dispute involving charges under IPC sections 406, 420, 504, and 506. Parmal had allegedly received ₹6,00,000 from Sushil Kumar for land purchase in 2014 but failed to execute the deed and subsequently transferred the property to someone else. When confronted about returning the remaining ₹50,000, he allegedly abused and threatened the complainant. The court found insufficient grounds for anticipatory bail given the circumstances, Parmal's non-cooperation with trial proceedings, and the nature of the charges, thereby dismissing the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.