BABAR vs State of U.P. — 1068/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),317(5),3(5). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010032362026

Filing Number

2971/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

1068/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

336

Police Station

DEOBAND

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),317(5),3(5)
Arms Act Section 3,25,27

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BABAR

    Adv. GAUTAM KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 1068/2026: Babar v. State of U.P. The court granted bail to petitioner Babar, who was arrested on 30.05.2025 in connection with a robbery and firing incident. The court found insufficient independent evidence corroborating the arrest and recovery of alleged stolen items, noting no police personnel were injured in the alleged incident. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal bond of ₹40,000 with a surety of equal amount, mandatory court appearance, and restraint from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1068/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1068/2026: Babar v. State of U.P. The court granted bail to petitioner Babar, who was arrested on 30.05.2025 in connection with a robbery and firing incident. The court found insufficient independent evidence corroborating the arrest and recovery of alleged stolen items, noting no police personnel were injured in the alleged incident. The court imposed bail conditions including a personal bond of ₹40,000 with a surety of equal amount, mandatory court appearance, and restraint from intimidating witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case