DAIYAN AND OTHER vs State of U.P. — 1070/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),109(1),351(2). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010032342026

Filing Number

2969/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

1070/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

29

Police Station

MIRZAPUR

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),109(1),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DAIYAN AND OTHER

    Adv. MR KHURSHEED AHMAD

  2. 2.UJAIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 1070/2026 Daiyan and Ujair v. State of U.P. The court granted bail to the accused (Daiyan and Ujair) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 191(2), 109(1), and 351(2), arising from a land dispute that escalated into violence on February 4, 2026. Although the complainant alleged that the accused attacked her husband and brother-in-law with weapons, the accused contended they were actually assaulted while already present on their own field. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on medical evidence showing non-grievous injuries and inconsistencies in police investigation, ordering release on personal bond and surety with prescribed conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1070/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1070/2026 Daiyan and Ujair v. State of U.P. The court granted bail to the accused (Daiyan and Ujair) in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 191(2), 109(1), and 351(2), arising from a land dispute that escalated into violence on February 4, 2026. Although the complainant alleged that the accused attacked her husband and brother-in-law with weapons, the accused contended they were actually assaulted while already present on their own field. The court found sufficient grounds for bail based on medical evidence showing non-grievous injuries and inconsistencies in police investigation, ordering release on personal bond and surety with prescribed conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case