SALMAN AND OTHER vs State of U.P. — 1071/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),319(2),336(3),338,340(2),61(2). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010032332026

Filing Number

2968/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

1071/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

116

Police Station

BEHAT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),319(2),336(3),338,340(2),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SALMAN AND OTHER

    Adv. MUNVVAR ALI

  2. 2.RAKIB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 1071/2026 Case: Salman (and others) and Rakib v. State of U.P. Court Decision: The bail application of petitioners Salman, Rakib, and others was rejected/dismissed on 18.03.2026. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient grounds to believe the petitioners committed serious fraud involving property sale. The evidence showed they deceived a buyer by fraudulently conducting a property deed sale for ₹26 lakh (including ₹25 lakh cash and ₹40 lakh cheque), with one accused impersonating another using forged documents and false biometric data at the registrar's office. Given the severity of the offense under IPC Sections 318, 319, 336, 338, 340, and 61, the court determined bail was not warranted at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1071/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 1071/2026 Case: Salman (and others) and Rakib v. State of U.P. Court Decision: The bail application of petitioners Salman, Rakib, and others was rejected/dismissed on 18.03.2026. Key Reasoning: The court found sufficient grounds to believe the petitioners committed serious fraud involving property sale. The evidence showed they deceived a buyer by fraudulently conducting a property deed sale for ₹26 lakh (including ₹25 lakh cash and ₹40 lakh cheque), with one accused impersonating another using forged documents and false biometric data at the registrar's office. Given the severity of the offense under IPC Sections 318, 319, 336, 338, 340, and 61, the court determined bail was not warranted at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case