ANKIT vs State of U.P. — 1076/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),115(2),324(4),54. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 24th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSP010032262026
Filing Number
2961/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
1076/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
44
Police Station
BARGAON
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ANKIT
Adv. MR JAIVEER SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of Bail OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 1076/2026 - ANKIT v. State of U.P. Court Decision: The bail petition of Ankit was GRANTED. The court found insufficient evidence to support the serious charges (IPC Sections 324, 109, 115, 54 BNS) and ruled that Ankit was falsely implicated based solely on co-accused statements. Medical evidence of injuries was minor and non-firearm related, contradicting allegations of attempted murder. Conditions: Ankit was released on bail with a personal bond of ₹40,000 and an approved surety of equal amount, on the condition that he appear for all hearings and comply with court directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
19-Mar-2026
hearing
District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1076/2026
Case Summary: 1076/2026 - ANKIT v. State of U.P. Court Decision: The bail petition of Ankit was GRANTED. The court found insufficient evidence to support the serious charges (IPC Sections 324, 109, 115, 54 BNS) and ruled that Ankit was falsely implicated based solely on co-accused statements. Medical evidence of injuries was minor and non-firearm related, contradicting allegations of attempted murder. Conditions: Ankit was released on bail with a personal bond of ₹40,000 and an approved surety of equal amount, on the condition that he appear for all hearings and comply with court directives. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts