KARTIK KUMAR AND OTHERS vs State of U.P. — 1077/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),126(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 31st March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010032252026

Filing Number

2960/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

1077/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

31-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

200

Police Station

BEHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),191(3),115(2),126(2),351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARTIK KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. RAMLAL LAMBA

  2. 2.RAVI

  3. 3.VISHAL

  4. 4.SANDEEP

  5. 5.PRASHANT

  6. 6.SOURABH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 31-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Summary: The court granted interim bail to Kartik Kumar, Ravi, Vishal, Sandeep, Prashant Kumar, and Saurabh in case 1077/2026 under charges of assault and criminal intimidation (IPC §191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 351(3)). The accused allegedly attacked a complainant with an iron rod and lathis on May 18, 2025, but the court found that they were not arrested during investigation and had no criminal history. The court imposed seven conditions including personal appearance at hearings, cooperation with proceedings, no threats to witnesses, and court permission before leaving the state, with bail fixed at Rs. 25,000 personal bond plus equal security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1077/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted interim bail to Kartik Kumar, Ravi, Vishal, Sandeep, Prashant Kumar, and Saurabh in case 1077/2026 under charges of assault and criminal intimidation (IPC §191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 351(3)). The accused allegedly attacked a complainant with an iron rod and lathis on May 18, 2025, but the court found that they were not arrested during investigation and had no criminal history. The court imposed seven conditions including personal appearance at hearings, cooperation with proceedings, no threats to witnesses, and court permission before leaving the state, with bail fixed at Rs. 25,000 personal bond plus equal security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case