U.P .Power Corporation vs MUSIR — 500040/2012
Disposed: Uncontested--DECIDED on 06th April 2026.
Electricity Act
CNR: UPSP010032252012
Filing Number
500040/2012
Filing Date
23-Jan-2012
Registration No
500040/2012
Registration Date
23-Jan-2012
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
Decision Date
06-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.U.P .Power Corporation
Adv. ADGC
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUSIR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State vs. Mushir (Case 500040/2012) Court Decision: The Special Judge acquitted defendant Mushir of charges under Section 135(2) of the Electricity Act 2003, granting him the benefit of doubt due to insufficient prosecution evidence. Key Reasoning: The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case: (1) the FIR was registered with a one-day delay despite the alleged incident on October 20, 2011; (2) no electric motor or cable was seized from the scene despite being central to the allegation; (3) significant inconsistencies existed between witness testimonies regarding distances and investigation details; (4) the defendant's signature was absent from key documents; and (5) no independent eyewitnesses corroborated the prosecution narrative. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
31-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
28-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
20-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
14-Jan-2026
Evidence
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
05-Jan-2026
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
22-Dec-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
15-Dec-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
05-Dec-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
26-Nov-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
17-Nov-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
17-Oct-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
01-Oct-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
17-Sep-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
08-Sep-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
30-Aug-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
22-Aug-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
14-Aug-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
28-May-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
04-Mar-2025
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
05-Dec-2024
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
11-Sep-2024
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
20-Jun-2024
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
05-Apr-2024
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
22-Jan-2024
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
25-Oct-2023
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
30-Aug-2023
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
31-May-2023
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
25-Apr-2023
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
23-Mar-2023
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
20-Jan-2023
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
17-Nov-2022
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
14-Sep-2022
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
16-Jun-2022
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
18-Apr-2022
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
21-Jan-2022
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
20-Nov-2021
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
21-Sep-2021
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
19-Jul-2021
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
28-Jun-2021
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
17-Apr-2021
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
20-Feb-2021
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
02-Jan-2021
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
20-Nov-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
09-Oct-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
04-Sep-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
12-Aug-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
22-Jul-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
06-Jul-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
10-Jun-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
14-May-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
20-Apr-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
25-Mar-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
28-Jan-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
17-Jan-2020
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
19-Dec-2019
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
09-Oct-2019
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
06-Jul-2019
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
08-Apr-2019
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
16-Jan-2019
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
13-Dec-2018
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
25-Sep-2018
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
07-Jun-2018
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
04-May-2018
Appereance
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
18-Dec-2017
Appereance
Sri. Suresh chandra Bharti C R No. 4
-
26-Oct-2017
Appereance
Sri. Suresh chandra Bharti C R No. 4
-
17-Aug-2017
Appereance
Sri. Suresh chandra Bharti C R No. 4
-
16-Aug-2017
Appereance
Sri. Suresh chandra Bharti C R No. 4
-
20-May-2017
Appereance
Sri. Suresh chandra Bharti C R No. 4
-
17-Apr-2017
Appereance
Sri. sajay Kumar-II / Addl. District Judge
-
16-Mar-2017
Appereance
Sri. sajay Kumar-II / Addl. District Judge
-
07-Mar-2017
Appereance
Sri. sajay Kumar-II / Addl. District Judge
-
17-Jan-2017
Appereance
Sri. sajay Kumar-II / Addl. District Judge
-
17-Dec-2016
Appereance
Sri. sajay Kumar-II / Addl. District Judge
-
04-Jun-2016
Appereance
-
06-May-2016
Appereance
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
30-Mar-2016
Appereance
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
14-Jan-2016
Appereance
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
21-Sep-2015
Evidence
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
15-Sep-2015
Disposed
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
15-Sep-2015
Restored
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
03-Sep-2015
Appereance
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
17-Jul-2015
Appereance
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
29-May-2015
Appereance
Sri. Ayaz Ahmad / Addl. District Judge C R No 1
-
27-Mar-2015
Appereance
Sri. G.P. Tiwari Addl. District Judge- 2 C. R.No.1
-
30-Jan-2015
Appereance
Sri. G.P. Tiwari Addl. District Judge- 2 C. R.No.1
-
26-Apr-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jan-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 500040/2012
Case Summary: State vs. Mushir (Case 500040/2012) Court Decision: The Special Judge acquitted defendant Mushir of charges under Section 135(2) of the Electricity Act 2003, granting him the benefit of doubt due to insufficient prosecution evidence. Key Reasoning: The court found critical gaps in the prosecution's case: (1) the FIR was registered with a one-day delay despite the alleged incident on October 20, 2011; (2) no electric motor or cable was seized from the scene despite being central to the allegation; (3) significant inconsistencies existed between witness testimonies regarding distances and investigation details; (4) the defendant's signature was absent from key documents; and (5) no independent eyewitnesses corroborated the prosecution narrative. The court concluded the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts