ARSHAD vs State of U.P. — 1079/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379,411. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 03rd April 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSP010032182026
Filing Number
2954/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
1079/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
172
Police Station
BEHARIGARH
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ARSHAD
Adv. DHARMPAL CHAUDHARY
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: 1079/2026 (Arshad v. State of U.P.) The court granted conditional anticipatory bail to petitioner Arshad, accused of illegally felling and stealing Khair (acacia) wood from reserved forest land under IPC §379, 411 and Indian Forest Act §26, 41, 42. The judge found that Arshad was not arrested at the scene, no wood was recovered from his possession, and his co-accused received bail on identical grounds; the offense carries maximum 7 years imprisonment. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with conditions requiring his court attendance, cooperation during trial, and abstention from intimidating witnesses or criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Apr-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
31-Mar-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 1079/2026
Case Summary: 1079/2026 (Arshad v. State of U.P.) The court granted conditional anticipatory bail to petitioner Arshad, accused of illegally felling and stealing Khair (acacia) wood from reserved forest land under IPC §379, 411 and Indian Forest Act §26, 41, 42. The judge found that Arshad was not arrested at the scene, no wood was recovered from his possession, and his co-accused received bail on identical grounds; the offense carries maximum 7 years imprisonment. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹25,000 with conditions requiring his court attendance, cooperation during trial, and abstention from intimidating witnesses or criminal activity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts