NASEEM vs State of U.P. — 951/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010029712026

Filing Number

2730/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

951/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

126

Police Station

SADAR BAZAR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASEEM

    Adv. CHARAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court at Saharpur granted bail to the petitioner Naseem in a criminal case (FIR under sections 303(2) and 317(2) BNS) involving motorcycle theft allegations. The court found that Naseem's non-appearance on the scheduled date was justified, as he was unaware of the charge sheet being filed, and that he had previously been on bail with no deliberate wrongdoing. The court approved the bail petition with conditions including personal appearance at all court hearings, furnishing a personal bond of ₹40,000, and a surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 951/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court at Saharpur granted bail to the petitioner Naseem in a criminal case (FIR under sections 303(2) and 317(2) BNS) involving motorcycle theft allegations. The court found that Naseem's non-appearance on the scheduled date was justified, as he was unaware of the charge sheet being filed, and that he had previously been on bail with no deliberate wrongdoing. The court approved the bail petition with conditions including personal appearance at all court hearings, furnishing a personal bond of ₹40,000, and a surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case