PANKAJ vs State of U.P. — 908/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5),61(2),336(3),338,340(2). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010026652026

Filing Number

2434/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

908/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

659

Police Station

KOTWALI DEHAT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(5),61(2),336(3),338,340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PANKAJ

    Adv. SH SATEESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 908/2026 - PANKAJ v. State of U.P. The court rejected Pankaj's bail application in this case involving charges under IPC sections 316(5), 336(3), 338, and 340(2). The accused was alleged to have conspired with bank employees to fraudulently withdraw funds from multiple bank account holders' accounts at Punjab National Bank, Punwarwa, by forging cheques and misappropriating deposited amounts. The court found the charges serious, noting evidence of systematic financial fraud affecting multiple citizens, and determined that bail was not justified due to flight risk and potential witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 908/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 908/2026 - PANKAJ v. State of U.P. The court rejected Pankaj's bail application in this case involving charges under IPC sections 316(5), 336(3), 338, and 340(2). The accused was alleged to have conspired with bank employees to fraudulently withdraw funds from multiple bank account holders' accounts at Punjab National Bank, Punwarwa, by forging cheques and misappropriating deposited amounts. The court found the charges serious, noting evidence of systematic financial fraud affecting multiple citizens, and determined that bail was not justified due to flight risk and potential witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case