CHANDRAPRAKASH AND OTHERS vs State of U.P. — 736/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010019862026

Filing Number

1801/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

736/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

307

Police Station

KUTUBSHER

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 316(2),115(2),352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRAPRAKASH AND OTHERS

    Adv. MR KALURAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

  2. 2.SONIYA GANDI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 736/2026 Court Decision: The Saharanpur District Court granted anticipatory bail to Chandraprakash and Sonia Gandhi in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), and 316(2). The court found the FIR was registered 21 days after the incident with no explanation, and determined the applicants were falsely implicated in a shop ownership dispute where no criminal offense was established. Key Reasoning: Following Supreme Court precedents, the court noted that anticipatory bail remains maintainable even after chargesheet filing if the accused was not arrested during investigation. With no prior criminal history and the weak prima facie case, bail was granted on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including mandatory court appearance and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 736/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 736/2026 Court Decision: The Saharanpur District Court granted anticipatory bail to Chandraprakash and Sonia Gandhi in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), and 316(2). The court found the FIR was registered 21 days after the incident with no explanation, and determined the applicants were falsely implicated in a shop ownership dispute where no criminal offense was established. Key Reasoning: Following Supreme Court precedents, the court noted that anticipatory bail remains maintainable even after chargesheet filing if the accused was not arrested during investigation. With no prior criminal history and the weak prima facie case, bail was granted on personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions including mandatory court appearance and cooperation with investigations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case