State of U.P. vs ANEES Advocate - M.ARIF — 469/2026

Case under Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 (U.p.) Section 3,5,8. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSP010010172026

Filing Number

905/2026

Filing Date

31-Jan-2026

Registration No

469/2026

Registration Date

31-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

262

Police Station

GANGOH

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, 1955 (U.p.) Section 3,5,8
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

    Adv. DGC

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANEES Advocate - M.ARIF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Case 469/2026 Summary: The court rejected ANEES's interim bail petition. ANEES was accused of animal cruelty under the Cow Protection Act and Animal Cruelty Act (FIR 262/2018, Gangoh Police Station), with charges including illegally confining and slaughtering cattle and possessing 150kg beef and slaughter equipment. The court found that ANEES deliberately delayed proceedings by not appearing despite obtaining bail, and subsequently obtained a non-bailable warrant, warranting bail rejection on grounds of conduct and case circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  6. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 469/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 469/2026 Summary: The court rejected ANEES's interim bail petition. ANEES was accused of animal cruelty under the Cow Protection Act and Animal Cruelty Act (FIR 262/2018, Gangoh Police Station), with charges including illegally confining and slaughtering cattle and possessing 150kg beef and slaughter equipment. The court found that ANEES deliberately delayed proceedings by not appearing despite obtaining bail, and subsequently obtained a non-bailable warrant, warranting bail rejection on grounds of conduct and case circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case