DILSHAD vs State of U.P. — 49/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPSP010008952026

Filing Number

797/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

49/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DILSHAD

    Adv. MR SHARVAN KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

  2. 2.KALEEM AHMAD

  3. 3.RASSO

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 49/2026 Dilshad v. State of U.P. and Others The Session Court (Saharpur) dismissed Dilshad's criminal revision petition challenging a lower court's order dated 02.01.2026 that had rejected his application for committing two related criminal cases to a single court. The court found no legal or factual error in the lower court's decision, as both FIR No. 78/2014 and Case No. 55/2015—involving the same incident, location, date, accused, and victim—were cross-cases properly pending in different courts. The revision was dismissed and the lower court's order was upheld, with directions to transfer both matters to the designated court for consolidated hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 49/2026 Dilshad v. State of U.P. and Others The Session Court (Saharpur) dismissed Dilshad's criminal revision petition challenging a lower court's order dated 02.01.2026 that had rejected his application for committing two related criminal cases to a single court. The court found no legal or factual error in the lower court's decision, as both FIR No. 78/2014 and Case No. 55/2015—involving the same incident, location, date, accused, and victim—were cross-cases properly pending in different courts. The revision was dismissed and the lower court's order was upheld, with directions to transfer both matters to the designated court for consolidated hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case