OMPAL ALIAS OM SAINI vs State of U.P. — 67/2026

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: UPSP010006052026

Filing Number

539/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

67/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OMPAL ALIAS OM SAINI

    Adv. MR JITENDRA MOHAN SAINI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

  2. 2.KIRAN

  3. 3.SHIV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 67/2026 The National Lok Adalat (Civil Court at Sahaspur, Saharanpur) accepted a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 54-day delay in filing an appeal. Appellant Ompal (Om Saini) sought condonation, citing delayed receipt of certified copies from the lower court and subsequent court closures that caused approximately two months of delay. The District Government Advocate opposed the petition but ultimately consented to its acceptance on merits. The court granted condonation, applying established principles that practical justice should prevail over technical strictness when examining delay under Section 5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 07-May-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 67/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 67/2026 The National Lok Adalat (Civil Court at Sahaspur, Saharanpur) accepted a petition under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 54-day delay in filing an appeal. Appellant Ompal (Om Saini) sought condonation, citing delayed receipt of certified copies from the lower court and subsequent court closures that caused approximately two months of delay. The District Government Advocate opposed the petition but ultimately consented to its acceptance on merits. The court granted condonation, applying established principles that practical justice should prevail over technical strictness when examining delay under Section 5. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case