MOHD. HARUN MUKHIYA S/O HULAM SABIR MUKHIYA vs SUDHIR KUMAR S/O SURESH KUMAR — 12/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 08th April 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Appeal

CNR: UPSP010002702026

Filing Number

29/2026

Filing Date

07-Jan-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

07-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

08-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. HARUN MUKHIYA S/O HULAM SABIR MUKHIYA

    Adv. SADIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUDHIR KUMAR S/O SURESH KUMAR

  2. 2.RANJAN KUMAR S/O SURESH KUMAR

  3. 3.RITESH KUMSR S/O SURESH KUMAR

  4. 4.SMT. RUKMANI W/O SURESH KUMAR

  5. 5.RAMESH KUMAR S/O HARIRAM

  6. 6.RAVINDRA KUMAR S/O RAMPAL SINGH

  7. 7.SMT. URMILA W/O RAMPAL SINGH

  8. 8.PRATAP S/O RISHIPAL

  9. 9.RAJESH S/O RISHIPAL

  10. 10.BIJENDRA S/O RISHIPAL

  11. 11.ISHU KOHLI S/O VIRENDRA SINGH

  12. 12.NITIN KOHLI S/O VIRENDRA SINGH

  13. 13.SMT. BABLI W/O VIRENDRA SINGH

  14. 14.NAWAB SINGH S/O RAMCHANDRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy of Bail OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: 12/2026 Court Decision: The District Judge of Saharpur dismissed Mohd. Harun Mukhiya's civil appeal and upheld the lower court's order dated 11.12.2025, which had rejected his petition under CPC Order 39 Rule 4. The court found that Mukhiya's challenge to the rejection lacked merit, as the lower court had properly considered the evidence and arguments from both parties regarding disputed property (Khsara No-120, Plot No-1) in Sarsawa, Nakud, Saharpur. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the original suit was properly filed concerning ancestral property allegedly purchased by the respondents' predecessor in 1974, and that the lower court correctly exercised its discretion in rejecting the interim relief petition. The judge confirmed that no legal error or procedural irregularity warranted interference with the lower court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  5. 03-Apr-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  6. 24-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  9. 09-Feb-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 12/2026 Court Decision: The District Judge of Saharpur dismissed Mohd. Harun Mukhiya's civil appeal and upheld the lower court's order dated 11.12.2025, which had rejected his petition under CPC Order 39 Rule 4. The court found that Mukhiya's challenge to the rejection lacked merit, as the lower court had properly considered the evidence and arguments from both parties regarding disputed property (Khsara No-120, Plot No-1) in Sarsawa, Nakud, Saharpur. Key Reasoning: The court determined that the original suit was properly filed concerning ancestral property allegedly purchased by the respondents' predecessor in 1974, and that the lower court correctly exercised its discretion in rejecting the interim relief petition. The judge confirmed that no legal error or procedural irregularity warranted interference with the lower court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case