Rajpati vs Ramapati and others — 504096/2005
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,506. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 09th March 2026.
Complaint Cases
CNR: UPSN040004712005
Filing Number
504096/2005
Filing Date
14-Nov-2005
Registration No
504096/2005
Registration Date
14-Nov-2005
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate
Judge
5-Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
KOIRAUNA
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rajpati
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ramapati and others
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
PDF of Bail OrderView PDF
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhadohi-Jaunpur acquitted accused persons Ramapati, Kamlashkar, Ramesh, and Krishna Kumar under Section 245(2) CrPC for insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused under Sections 323, 504, 506, 406, 452, and 427 IPC, noting procedural lapses and lack of credible evidence to support the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
23-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
31-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
11-Nov-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
24-Jun-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
11-Jun-2025
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
16-Apr-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
06-Feb-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
06-Jan-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
02-Jan-2025
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
14-Nov-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
10-Oct-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
31-Jul-2024
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
21-May-2024
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
07-Mar-2024
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
20-Dec-2023
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
12-Oct-2023
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
04-Aug-2023
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
30-May-2023
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
24-Mar-2023
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
16-Jan-2023
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
03-Nov-2022
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
06-Aug-2022
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
19-Jul-2022
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
19-May-2022
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
14-Apr-2022
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
13-Jan-2022
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
14-Oct-2021
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
16-Jul-2021
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
30-Apr-2021
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
30-Jan-2021
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
21-Nov-2020
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
10-Sep-2020
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
03-Jul-2020
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
24-Apr-2020
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
06-Feb-2020
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
04-Dec-2019
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
20-Sep-2019
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
26-Jul-2019
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
13-May-2019
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
02-Mar-2019
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
18-Dec-2018
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
29-Oct-2018
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
23-Jul-2018
Stay from Higher court
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
04-Jun-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
18-Apr-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
14-Feb-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
10-Jan-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
16-Nov-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
16-Nov-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
05-Sep-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
16-Jun-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
15-Mar-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
06-Jan-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
14-Oct-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
15-Sep-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
18-Jun-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
20-Apr-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
04-Feb-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
24-Apr-2015
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate Bhadohi
-
28-Feb-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Nov-2005
Case filed
Registration No. 504096/2005
Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Bhadohi-Jaunpur acquitted accused persons Ramapati, Kamlashkar, Ramesh, and Krishna Kumar under Section 245(2) CrPC for insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case against the accused under Sections 323, 504, 506, 406, 452, and 427 IPC, noting procedural lapses and lack of credible evidence to support the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts