UP State vs Radheshyam Bind Advocate - OM PRAKASH MAURYA — 238/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,148,149,323,504,506,352. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 09th March 2026.
Session Trial - Session Case
CNR: UPSN010020822017
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1459/2017
Filing Date
23-10-2017
Registration No
238/2017
Registration Date
23-10-2017
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
FIR Details
FIR Number
153
Police Station
OONJ
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UP State
Respondent(s)
Radheshyam Bind Advocate - OM PRAKASH MAURYA
Manoj Bind
Vikash
Ramesh
Shyamdhar Bind
kusum Devi
Rakesh
Anil Bind
Sunil
Triloki Bind
Satya Prakash
Sachin
kamla Devi
Ram Das@ Santosh
Rajesh
Khudkhudi Bind
Vinay Bind
Panchu Bind
Arvind Bind
Shivdhari Bind
Jaykesh Pal
Rajmani Pal
Shiv Gopal Bind
Lambu @ Bablu
Gulabdhar
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Disposed
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 06-03-2026 | Appearance | |
| 25-02-2026 | Appearance | |
| 12-02-2026 | Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge for SC/ST Act cases in Bhadohi granted bail to the accused Mohammad Khalid in a cheating case (FIR No. 115/2025 under IPC Sections 316(2), 352 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)). The court accepted the bail plea after noting that the accused cooperated during investigation, had no criminal history, the complainant filed no objection affidavit, and there was no misuse of interim bail, thereby finding sufficient grounds to release the accused on bail with standard conditions including two sureties of ₹20,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge for SC/ST Act cases in Bhadohi granted bail to the accused Mohammad Khalid in a cheating case (FIR No. 115/2025 under IPC Sections 316(2), 352 and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)). The court accepted the bail plea after noting that the accused cooperated during investigation, had no criminal history, the complainant filed no objection affidavit, and there was no misuse of interim bail, thereby finding sufficient grounds to release the accused on bail with standard conditions including two sureties of ₹20,000 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts