U.P. State vs Sandeep Singh Advocate - Ashok Kumar Pandey — 400238/2012
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Section 3(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
Special Trial
CNR: UPSN010010382012
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
400238/2012
Filing Date
31-03-2012
Registration No
400238/2012
Registration Date
31-03-2012
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
702
Police Station
GOPIGANJ
Year
2006
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
U.P. State
Adv. Adgc
Respondent(s)
Sandeep Singh Advocate - Ashok Kumar Pandey
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 20-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 17-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 13-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Decision The Special Session Court in Bhadohi acquitted all accused persons (Sandeep Singh alias Pintu, Udayabhaan Singh alias Doctor, Pramod Shukla, Narendra Kumar Singh alias Kakku, Virendra Singh, Yogendra Shukla alias Sanu, and Tarej Khan) on charges under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster Act and anti-social activities law. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an organized gang for committing crimes and acquiring illegal financial benefits, giving them the benefit of doubt and acquitting them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Court Decision The Special Session Court in Bhadohi acquitted all accused persons (Sandeep Singh alias Pintu, Udayabhaan Singh alias Doctor, Pramod Shukla, Narendra Kumar Singh alias Kakku, Virendra Singh, Yogendra Shukla alias Sanu, and Tarej Khan) on charges under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster Act and anti-social activities law. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused formed an organized gang for committing crimes and acquiring illegal financial benefits, giving them the benefit of doubt and acquitting them. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts