UP State vs Narendra Kumar and Others Advocate - DINESH KUMAR SINGH — 400034/2012
Case under Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti Section 3(1). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 31st March 2026.
Special Trial
CNR: UPSN010008462012
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
400034/2012
Filing Date
28-03-2012
Registration No
400034/2012
Registration Date
28-03-2012
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi
Decision Date
31st March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
702
Police Station
GOPIGANJ
Year
2006
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UP State
Adv. Adgc
Respondent(s)
Narendra Kumar and Others Advocate - DINESH KUMAR SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Defence Evidence
Defence Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 31-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 20-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 17-03-2026 | Defence Evidence | |
| 13-03-2026 | Defence Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted all accused under the UP Gangster Act, 1986. Special Judge Pushpa Singh found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused—Sandeep Singh (Pintu), Udayabhaan Singh (Doctor), Pramod Shukla, Narendra Kumar Singh (Kakku), Virendra Singh, Yogendra Shukla (Sanu), and Tarej Khan—had formed an organized gang for economic gain through violence and intimidation as required under Section 3(1) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted all accused under the UP Gangster Act, 1986. Special Judge Pushpa Singh found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused—Sandeep Singh (Pintu), Udayabhaan Singh (Doctor), Pramod Shukla, Narendra Kumar Singh (Kakku), Virendra Singh, Yogendra Shukla (Sanu), and Tarej Khan—had formed an organized gang for economic gain through violence and intimidation as required under Section 3(1) of the Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts