Atiq Ahmad vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 249/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010007762026

Filing Number

699/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

249/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

517

Police Station

BHADOHI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Atiq Ahmad

    Adv. Sabhajeet Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    PDF of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court rejected the bail application of Atiq Ahmad, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act, finding prima facie evidence of serious crimes including theft, dacoity, and attempted murder committed as part of an organized gang. The court noted the accused's extensive criminal history (9 other cases), recovery of firearms and stolen vehicles during arrest, and the gravity of offenses under the Gangster Act, which restricts bail unless the court is satisfied of the accused's innocence and that he poses no further criminal risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 249/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected the bail application of Atiq Ahmad, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act, finding prima facie evidence of serious crimes including theft, dacoity, and attempted murder committed as part of an organized gang. The court noted the accused's extensive criminal history (9 other cases), recovery of firearms and stolen vehicles during arrest, and the gravity of offenses under the Gangster Act, which restricts bail unless the court is satisfied of the accused's innocence and that he poses no further criminal risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case