Sudhir Dubey vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 247/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 18th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010007742026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
697/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
247/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
98
Police Station
GOPIGANJ
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhir Dubey
Adv. Chhotelal Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO) rejected the bail petition of Sudhir Dubey, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act, 1986 for his alleged involvement in gang-related criminal activities including theft and attempted murder. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused was part of an organized gang and therefore did not meet the stringent bail criteria under Section 19(4) of the Gangster Act, which requires proof that the accused is not guilty and poses no risk of reoffense. The bail petition was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO) rejected the bail petition of Sudhir Dubey, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act, 1986 for his alleged involvement in gang-related criminal activities including theft and attempted murder. The court found prima facie evidence that the accused was part of an organized gang and therefore did not meet the stringent bail criteria under Section 19(4) of the Gangster Act, which requires proof that the accused is not guilty and poses no risk of reoffense. The bail petition was accordingly dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts