Ram babu urf Bhanu vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 246/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010007732026

Filing Number

696/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

246/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1

Police Station

GOPIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ram babu urf Bhanu

    Adv. Dinesh Chandra Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    PDF of Bail OrderView PDF

    The court (Special Additional Sessions Judge, POCSO-I/Gangster Act, Bhadohi) rejected the interim bail petition of Rambaboo alias Bhanu, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act, 2026. The judge found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in organized criminal activity with co-accused, including theft of motorcycles with forged number plates, and determined that no justified grounds existed to grant interim bail considering the seriousness of the charges and criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 246/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court (Special Additional Sessions Judge, POCSO-I/Gangster Act, Bhadohi) rejected the interim bail petition of Rambaboo alias Bhanu, accused under Section 3(1) of the UP Gangster Act, 2026. The judge found prima facie evidence of the accused's involvement in organized criminal activity with co-accused, including theft of motorcycles with forged number plates, and determined that no justified grounds existed to grant interim bail considering the seriousness of the charges and criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case