Rajesh Pratap Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 49/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 490,498. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRIMINAL MISC. CASES

CNR: UPSN010007722026

Filing Number

695/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

49/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

246

Police Station

GOPIGANJ

Year

2012

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 490,498

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Pratap Singh

    Adv. Tej Bahadur Yadav

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    PDF of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Court, Bhadohi, accepted the application of Rajesh Pratap Singh to refund his bail amount of Rs. 2,00,000 deposited in cash, as his bail was granted on 30.10.2025 and he was acquitted in the trial on 07.03.2026. The court directed the Central Nazir to transfer the deposited bail amount to the applicant's wife, Shashikala Singh, as per applicable procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 49/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Court, Bhadohi, accepted the application of Rajesh Pratap Singh to refund his bail amount of Rs. 2,00,000 deposited in cash, as his bail was granted on 30.10.2025 and he was acquitted in the trial on 07.03.2026. The court directed the Central Nazir to transfer the deposited bail amount to the applicant's wife, Shashikala Singh, as per applicable procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case