Shubham Bind vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 255/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),87,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 13th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010007702026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
693/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
255/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
39
Police Station
KOTWALI GYANPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shubham Bind
Adv. Om Prakash Bind
Respondent(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Additional Sessions Court (POCSO-I), Ghazipur-Bhadohi granted bail to 22-year-old Shubham Bind in a case involving charges under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS, finding that the victim's statement contained significant contradictions and that she had voluntarily accompanied the accused out of her own will. The court noted that while the victim initially stated she was abducted and raped, in her subsequent statement under Section 183 CrPC, she clarified she left home willingly, wished to marry the accused, and denied any sexual assault. Accordingly, the court accepted the bail application on conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard bail restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Additional Sessions Court (POCSO-I), Ghazipur-Bhadohi granted bail to 22-year-old Shubham Bind in a case involving charges under Sections 137(2) and 87 of the BNS, finding that the victim's statement contained significant contradictions and that she had voluntarily accompanied the accused out of her own will. The court noted that while the victim initially stated she was abducted and raped, in her subsequent statement under Section 183 CrPC, she clarified she left home willingly, wished to marry the accused, and denied any sexual assault. Accordingly, the court accepted the bail application on conditions including a personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties and standard bail restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts