Sarita Devi Yadav vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 254/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 406,419,420,. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 24th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010007682026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
691/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
254/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
KOTWALI GYANPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarita Devi Yadav
Adv. Ashok Kumar Mishra
Respondent(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Hearing History
Judge: 6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO) at Gyanpur, Bhadohi granted anticipatory bail to Sarita Devi Yadav in Criminal Case No. 64/2025 under IPC Sections 419, 420, and 406, involving allegations of submitting fake gold ornaments to obtain loans from Indian Bank. The court found that while the charges involve serious fraud in the gold loan scheme, the case is triable by Magistrate court with maximum punishment under 7 years, and sufficient grounds exist to release the accused on interim bail subject to conditions including personal bond of ₹50,000, attendance during trial, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO) at Gyanpur, Bhadohi granted anticipatory bail to Sarita Devi Yadav in Criminal Case No. 64/2025 under IPC Sections 419, 420, and 406, involving allegations of submitting fake gold ornaments to obtain loans from Indian Bank. The court found that while the charges involve serious fraud in the gold loan scheme, the case is triable by Magistrate court with maximum punishment under 7 years, and sufficient grounds exist to release the accused on interim bail subject to conditions including personal bond of ₹50,000, attendance during trial, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts