Kanhaeya Lal Gautam vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 252/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(4),318(4),. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010007652026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
688/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
252/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
AURAI
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kanhaeya Lal Gautam
Adv. Sabhajeet Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhadohi granted bail to Kanhaiyalal Gautam in FIR No. 32/2026 under sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 318(4) BNS. The court found insufficient evidence against the accused, noting that no ATM card or money was recovered from his possession and no independent witness supported the alleged recovery. The court approved bail on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhadohi granted bail to Kanhaiyalal Gautam in FIR No. 32/2026 under sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 318(4) BNS. The court found insufficient evidence against the accused, noting that no ATM card or money was recovered from his possession and no independent witness supported the alleged recovery. The court approved bail on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts