Kanhaeya Lal Gautam vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 252/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(4),318(4). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010007652026

Filing Number

688/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

252/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

AURAI

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),317(2),317(4),318(4)

Petitioner(s)

1.Kanhaeya Lal Gautam

Adv. Sabhajeet Singh

Respondent(s)

1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
25-Mar-2026

PDF of Bail OrderView PDF

Case Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhadohi granted bail to Kanhaiyalal Gautam in FIR No. 32/2026 under sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 318(4) BNS. The court found insufficient evidence against the accused, noting that no ATM card or money was recovered from his possession and no independent witness supported the alleged recovery. The court approved bail on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
25-Mar-2026

Disposed

Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
17-Mar-2026

Hearing

Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
13-Mar-2026

Hearing

Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 252/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhadohi granted bail to Kanhaiyalal Gautam in FIR No. 32/2026 under sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 318(4) BNS. The court found insufficient evidence against the accused, noting that no ATM card or money was recovered from his possession and no independent witness supported the alleged recovery. The court approved bail on two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.