Vijay Kumar Gautam Urf Kallu vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 251/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 31st March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010007642026
Filing Number
687/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
251/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Decision Date
31-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECT
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
SURIAYAWN
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vijay Kumar Gautam Urf Kallu
Adv. Prabhakar Tiwari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
31-Mar-2026
PDF of OrderView PDF
The Special Judge for SC/ST (Atrocities) Act in Bhadohi rejected the bail plea of Vijay Kumar Gautam (alias Kallu) on March 31, 2026, finding him involved in serious offenses under UP Cow Slaughter Act and Arms Act. The court held that evidence of cattle slaughter, recovery of beef, and illegal firearms from the accused's possession indicated grave crimes, making bail unsuitable without considering the merits of the case in detail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
31-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
25-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
23-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
17-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 251/2026
The Special Judge for SC/ST (Atrocities) Act in Bhadohi rejected the bail plea of Vijay Kumar Gautam (alias Kallu) on March 31, 2026, finding him involved in serious offenses under UP Cow Slaughter Act and Arms Act. The court held that evidence of cattle slaughter, recovery of beef, and illegal firearms from the accused's possession indicated grave crimes, making bail unsuitable without considering the merits of the case in detail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts