Vijay Kumar Gautam Urf Kallu vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 251/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 31st March 2026.

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010007642026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

687/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

251/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

Decision Date

31st March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECT

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

SURIAYAWN

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),
Indian Arms Act Section 3/25 ,27
Prevention of cruelty to Animals Act Section 3/5A/8

Petitioner(s)

Vijay Kumar Gautam Urf Kallu

Adv. Prabhakar Tiwari

Respondent(s)

State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

31-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Hearing

23-03-2026

Hearing

17-03-2026

Hearing

13-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

31-03-2026
PDF of Order

The Special Judge for SC/ST (Atrocities) Act in Bhadohi rejected the bail plea of Vijay Kumar Gautam (alias Kallu) on March 31, 2026, finding him involved in serious offenses under UP Cow Slaughter Act and Arms Act. The court held that evidence of cattle slaughter, recovery of beef, and illegal firearms from the accused's possession indicated grave crimes, making bail unsuitable without considering the merits of the case in detail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Judge for SC/ST (Atrocities) Act in Bhadohi rejected the bail plea of Vijay Kumar Gautam (alias Kallu) on March 31, 2026, finding him involved in serious offenses under UP Cow Slaughter Act and Arms Act. The court held that evidence of cattle slaughter, recovery of beef, and illegal firearms from the accused's possession indicated grave crimes, making bail unsuitable without considering the merits of the case in detail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case