Nitin Pandey vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 243/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),61(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010007592026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
684/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
243/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
563
Police Station
GOPIGANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nitin Pandey
Adv. Sharada Prasad Mishra
Respondent(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Bhadohi granted bail to accused Nitin Pandey in a cheating case (IPC Sections 318(4) and 61(2) BNS) involving alleged fraudulent acquisition of silver jewelry worth ₹65,000 from a jeweler. The court found that the accused was not named in the original FIR, his name emerged only through co-accused statements, co-accused had already been granted bail, and there was no prior criminal history, making bail appropriate. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition of court attendance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Bhadohi granted bail to accused Nitin Pandey in a cheating case (IPC Sections 318(4) and 61(2) BNS) involving alleged fraudulent acquisition of silver jewelry worth ₹65,000 from a jeweler. The court found that the accused was not named in the original FIR, his name emerged only through co-accused statements, co-accused had already been granted bail, and there was no prior criminal history, making bail appropriate. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition of court attendance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts