Nitin Pandey vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 243/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),61(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010007592026

Filing Number

684/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

243/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

563

Police Station

GOPIGANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),61(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nitin Pandey

    Adv. Sharada Prasad Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    PDF of Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Bhadohi granted bail to accused Nitin Pandey in a cheating case (IPC Sections 318(4) and 61(2) BNS) involving alleged fraudulent acquisition of silver jewelry worth ₹65,000 from a jeweler. The court found that the accused was not named in the original FIR, his name emerged only through co-accused statements, co-accused had already been granted bail, and there was no prior criminal history, making bail appropriate. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition of court attendance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 243/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Bhadohi granted bail to accused Nitin Pandey in a cheating case (IPC Sections 318(4) and 61(2) BNS) involving alleged fraudulent acquisition of silver jewelry worth ₹65,000 from a jeweler. The court found that the accused was not named in the original FIR, his name emerged only through co-accused statements, co-accused had already been granted bail, and there was no prior criminal history, making bail appropriate. The accused was released on personal bond of ₹50,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition of court attendance and non-intimidation of witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case