Anand Singh Urf Anuj vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 238/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(a),331(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010007522026
Filing Number
679/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
238/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
228
Police Station
KOIRAUNA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anand Singh Urf Anuj
Adv. Tej Bahadur Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
PDF of Bail OrderView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 238/2026
SUMMARY: The court granted bail to Anand Singh (age 25) in a theft case (FIR No. 228/2025) under BNS sections 305(a), 331(4), and 317(2). The court found that while the accused was named during investigation, he was not originally named in the FIR, there were no independent/public witnesses to the alleged theft or the recovery memo, and the magistrate must examine these matters—thus providing sufficient grounds for bail. The accused was released on two sureties of ₹25,000 each with conditions including not leaving the country, not tampering with witnesses, and cooperating in trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts