Anand Singh Urf Anuj vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 237/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 305(A),331(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010007512026
Filing Number
678/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
237/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
167
Police Station
KOIRAUNA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Anand Singh Urf Anuj
Adv. Tej Bahadur Yadav
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
PDF of Bail OrderView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 237/2026
SUMMARY: The court granted bail to Anand Singh (alias Anuj), accused under BNS sections 305(a), 331(4), and 317(2) for alleged theft from a TVS agency. The court found that the accused was not originally named in the FIR (which was registered against unknown persons), there were no independent/public witnesses to the alleged theft or recovery, and the charges are triable by a magistrate. Consequently, the court deemed bail grounds sufficient and released the accused on two surety bonds of ₹25,000 each with conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts