Vijay urf Bullar vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 228/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,117(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010007062026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

634/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

228/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

147

Police Station

CHAURI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,117(2)
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1) D Dh

Petitioner(s)

Vijay urf Bullar

Respondent(s)

State of Uttar Pradesh

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

09-03-2026

Hearing

27-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
PDF of Bail Order

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Bhadohi granted bail to accused Vijay Bullar and Sanidevl on bail bonds of ₹1,00,000 each under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 117(2) and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d). The court found the charges of assault, abuse with caste slurs, and intimidation serious, but considered the accused's cooperation during investigation, lack of criminal history, absence of bail misuse, and principles established in legal precedent sufficient grounds for release on bail with conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and non-commission of further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Bhadohi granted bail to accused Vijay Bullar and Sanidevl on bail bonds of ₹1,00,000 each under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 117(2) and SC/ST Act Section 3(1)(d). The court found the charges of assault, abuse with caste slurs, and intimidation serious, but considered the accused's cooperation during investigation, lack of criminal history, absence of bail misuse, and principles established in legal precedent sufficient grounds for release on bail with conditions including non-tampering with witnesses and non-commission of further offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case