Gayatri Devi vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 227/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),109(1),115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010007012026

Filing Number

629/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

227/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

GOPIGANJ

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 191(2),109(1),115(2),352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gayatri Devi

    Adv. Rajkumar

  2. 2.Rani Urf Bandna

  3. 3.Foto

  4. 4.Rajdhani Urf Sanjana

  5. 5.Amrita Urf Amirti

  6. 6.Susma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    PDF of Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadohi rejected the anticipatory bail petition of six accused (Gayatri Devi, Rani, Photo, Rajdhani, Amrita, and Surma) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 109(1), 115(2), 352, and 351(3). The court found that the allegations—involving a violent assault on the complainant's daughter with weapons causing serious injuries requiring hospitalization—were not baseless and hence declined to grant pre-arrest bail, citing the serious nature of charges carrying sentences up to life imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Addl. District and Sessions Judge-I Bhadohi

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 227/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadohi rejected the anticipatory bail petition of six accused (Gayatri Devi, Rani, Photo, Rajdhani, Amrita, and Surma) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 191(2), 109(1), 115(2), 352, and 351(3). The court found that the allegations—involving a violent assault on the complainant's daughter with weapons causing serious injuries requiring hospitalization—were not baseless and hence declined to grant pre-arrest bail, citing the serious nature of charges carrying sentences up to life imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case