pintu bind vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 215/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010006782026

Filing Number

611/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

283

Police Station

AURAI

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.pintu bind

    Adv. Shamshad Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Uttar Pradesh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    PDF of Bail OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Special Additional Sessions Judge of Bhadohi rejected the bail petition (Jamaat Prarthna Patra) filed by accused Pintu Bind under the UP Prohibition of Gangsterism and Anti-Social Activities Act, 1986. The court found that the accused is involved in serious criminal activities as a gang member, with charges including murder, and determined there was no justified grounds for bail under Section 19(4) of the Act given the gravity of offenses and criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Additional Sessions Judge of Bhadohi rejected the bail petition (Jamaat Prarthna Patra) filed by accused Pintu Bind under the UP Prohibition of Gangsterism and Anti-Social Activities Act, 1986. The court found that the accused is involved in serious criminal activities as a gang member, with charges including murder, and determined there was no justified grounds for bail under Section 19(4) of the Act given the gravity of offenses and criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case