Sandeep Dubey vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 223/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),80(2),85. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010006772026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
610/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
223/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
225
Police Station
KOTWALI GYANPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sandeep Dubey
Adv. Surendra Nath Singh
Respondent(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Bhadohi rejected the bail petition of Sandeep Dubey, accused of dowry-related harassment and murder of his wife Priyanka Tiwari in September 2025. The court found the charges serious, noting that the accused and co-accused demanded a motorcycle and ₹5 lakh as additional dowry, physically and mentally harassed the victim, and ultimately caused her death by strangulation after four years of marriage—supported by post-mortem evidence showing ligature marks and multiple injuries consistent with ante-mortem hanging. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Session Court of Bhadohi rejected the bail petition of Sandeep Dubey, accused of dowry-related harassment and murder of his wife Priyanka Tiwari in September 2025. The court found the charges serious, noting that the accused and co-accused demanded a motorcycle and ₹5 lakh as additional dowry, physically and mentally harassed the victim, and ultimately caused her death by strangulation after four years of marriage—supported by post-mortem evidence showing ligature marks and multiple injuries consistent with ante-mortem hanging. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts