Vimal Mishra vs Shyama Shankar — 44/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 28th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRIMINAL MISC. CASES

CNR: UPSN010006722026

Filing Number

605/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

44/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

Decision Date

28-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

KOIRAUNA

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vimal Mishra

    Adv. Vijay Narayan Pandey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shyama Shankar

  2. 2.Ram Mohan Mishra

  3. 3.Deepak Mishra

  4. 4.Amit Mishra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Mar-2026

    PDF of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Court at Bhadohi granted the transfer petition and ordered the consolidation of two cross-cases (Case No. 132/2025 and 150/2023) pending in different courts into a single court for joint hearing and disposal. The court found that the parties, who are co-lessees of a village and have reconciled their disputes, warranted transfer of the case to facilitate unified proceedings under the SC/ST Act and POCSO Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Court at Bhadohi granted the transfer petition and ordered the consolidation of two cross-cases (Case No. 132/2025 and 150/2023) pending in different courts into a single court for joint hearing and disposal. The court found that the parties, who are co-lessees of a village and have reconciled their disputes, warranted transfer of the case to facilitate unified proceedings under the SC/ST Act and POCSO Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case