Umesh Singh vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 193/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147,323,504,506,379. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010006242026
Filing Number
566/2026
Filing Date
20-Feb-2026
Registration No
193/2026
Registration Date
20-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
GOPIGANJ
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Umesh Singh
Adv. Nand Lal Shukla
-
2.Radhey Singh Urf Rajesh Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
PDF of OrderView PDF
Summary The Sessions Court, Bhadohi rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Umesh Singh and Radhe Singh (alias Rajesh Singh) in a 38-year-old criminal case (FIR No. 3837/2008) involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, criminal intimidation, and theft under IPC Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, and 379. The court noted that the accused had delayed proceedings through repeated petitions to higher courts and must now comply with the High Court's February 5, 2026 order directing them to appear before the magistrate court for charge framing; since the maximum punishment is only seven years imprisonment, the accused must follow judicial directives to proceed with trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
20-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 193/2026
Summary The Sessions Court, Bhadohi rejected the anticipatory bail petition of Umesh Singh and Radhe Singh (alias Rajesh Singh) in a 38-year-old criminal case (FIR No. 3837/2008) involving charges of rioting, criminal intimidation, criminal intimidation, and theft under IPC Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, and 379. The court noted that the accused had delayed proceedings through repeated petitions to higher courts and must now comply with the High Court's February 5, 2026 order directing them to appear before the magistrate court for charge framing; since the maximum punishment is only seven years imprisonment, the accused must follow judicial directives to proceed with trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts