Shree Karshan Pathak vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 171/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,427,452. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 09th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010005872026
Filing Number
533/2026
Filing Date
16-Feb-2026
Registration No
171/2026
Registration Date
16-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
Decision Date
09-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
36
Police Station
KOTWALI GYANPUR
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shree Karshan Pathak
Adv. Ravindra Nath Mishra
-
2.Rahul Kumar
Adv. Ravindra Nath Mishra
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Uttar Pradesh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Mar-2026
PDF of OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Bhadohi granted advance bail to both accused, Shrikrishna Pathak and Rahul Kumar, in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and property damage (IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 452) arising from a domestic dispute between the accused's family and the complainant's son's wife. The court found the advance bail application justified, considering the lack of prior criminal history, no evidence of non-cooperation during investigation, and the existence of counter-cases filed by the accused's family member, and released them on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Mar-2026
Disposed
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
26-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
21-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
16-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 171/2026
Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court at Bhadohi granted advance bail to both accused, Shrikrishna Pathak and Rahul Kumar, in a case involving charges of assault, criminal intimidation, and property damage (IPC Sections 323, 504, 506, 427, 452) arising from a domestic dispute between the accused's family and the complainant's son's wife. The court found the advance bail application justified, considering the lack of prior criminal history, no evidence of non-cooperation during investigation, and the existence of counter-cases filed by the accused's family member, and released them on personal bonds of ₹50,000 each with two sureties of equal amount, subject to standard conditions including cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts