Rahul Bind vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 126/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),117(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010004042026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

365/2026

Filing Date

04-02-2026

Registration No

126/2026

Registration Date

04-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

Decision Date

09th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

60

Police Station

DURGA GANJ

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),117(2)
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1) D DH

Petitioner(s)

Rahul Bind

Respondent(s)

State of Uttar Pradesh

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

09-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Hearing

18-02-2026

Hearing

13-02-2026

Hearing

09-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

09-03-2026
PDF of Bail Order

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhadohi-Jaunpur granted bail to the accused Rahul Bind under Case No. 60/2025, charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), and SC/ST Act section 3(1). The court found that the accused had cooperated during investigation, had no prior criminal history, and had not misused interim bail since February 4, 2026. Consequently, the bail application was accepted with conditions including a bond of ₹1,00,000 and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction, tampering with witnesses, and engaging in criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhadohi-Jaunpur granted bail to the accused Rahul Bind under Case No. 60/2025, charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), and SC/ST Act section 3(1). The court found that the accused had cooperated during investigation, had no prior criminal history, and had not misused interim bail since February 4, 2026. Consequently, the bail application was accepted with conditions including a bond of ₹1,00,000 and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction, tampering with witnesses, and engaging in criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case