Rahul Bind vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 126/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),117(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 09th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010004042026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
365/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
126/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
60
Police Station
DURGA GANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rahul Bind
Respondent(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 18-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 13-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhadohi-Jaunpur granted bail to the accused Rahul Bind under Case No. 60/2025, charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), and SC/ST Act section 3(1). The court found that the accused had cooperated during investigation, had no prior criminal history, and had not misused interim bail since February 4, 2026. Consequently, the bail application was accepted with conditions including a bond of ₹1,00,000 and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction, tampering with witnesses, and engaging in criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Bhadohi-Jaunpur granted bail to the accused Rahul Bind under Case No. 60/2025, charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 117(2), and SC/ST Act section 3(1). The court found that the accused had cooperated during investigation, had no prior criminal history, and had not misused interim bail since February 4, 2026. Consequently, the bail application was accepted with conditions including a bond of ₹1,00,000 and restrictions on leaving the jurisdiction, tampering with witnesses, and engaging in criminal activities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts