Sudama Yadav vs State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey — 105/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),336(3),340(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 11th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010003192026
Filing Number
289/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
105/2026
Registration Date
29-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
DURGA GANJ
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sudama Yadav
Adv. Vivek Pandey
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Uttar Pradesh Advocate - Dinesh Kumar Pandey
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
PDF of Bail OrderView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Special Additional Sessions Court, Bhadohi, granted interim bail to accused Sudama Yadav in Criminal Case No. 03/2025 under BNS sections 318(4), 336(3), and 340(2). The court found significant investigation deficiencies, including lack of evidence directly linking the accused, failure to prosecute the actual beneficiary (Chanda Devi), and procedural irregularities that weakened the prosecution's case, making interim bail appropriate pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
-
19-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
-
09-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ/Spl. Judge POCSO-I Bhadohi
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge Bhadohi
-
29-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 105/2026
Court Decision Summary The Special Additional Sessions Court, Bhadohi, granted interim bail to accused Sudama Yadav in Criminal Case No. 03/2025 under BNS sections 318(4), 336(3), and 340(2). The court found significant investigation deficiencies, including lack of evidence directly linking the accused, failure to prosecute the actual beneficiary (Chanda Devi), and procedural irregularities that weakened the prosecution's case, making interim bail appropriate pending trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts