Ajit kumar Maurya vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 99/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352.115(2).127(2).351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010002872026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

260/2026

Filing Date

28-01-2026

Registration No

99/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

623

Police Station

CHAURI

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352.115(2).127(2).351(3)
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1) D Dh

Petitioner(s)

Ajit kumar Maurya

Respondent(s)

State of Uttar Pradesh

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Hearing

05-03-2026

Hearing

17-02-2026

Hearing

12-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
PDF of Bail Order

The court granted bail to two accused, Ajeet Kumar Maurya and Kallu (Jitendra Kumar Maurya), charged under IPC sections 352, 115(2), 127(2), 351(3) and SC/ST Act provisions for allegedly assaulting, abusing, and using caste-based slurs against the complainant and his associate. Each accused was released on bail with a bond of ₹25,000, subject to conditions including not leaving the country, not tampering with witnesses, and cooperating with the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to two accused, Ajeet Kumar Maurya and Kallu (Jitendra Kumar Maurya), charged under IPC sections 352, 115(2), 127(2), 351(3) and SC/ST Act provisions for allegedly assaulting, abusing, and using caste-based slurs against the complainant and his associate. Each accused was released on bail with a bond of ₹25,000, subject to conditions including not leaving the country, not tampering with witnesses, and cooperating with the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case