Ajit kumar Maurya vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 99/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352.115(2).127(2).351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010002872026
Filing Number
260/2026
Filing Date
28-Jan-2026
Registration No
99/2026
Registration Date
28-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Decision Date
11-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
623
Police Station
CHAURI
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajit kumar Maurya
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Uttar Pradesh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Mar-2026
PDF of Bail OrderView PDF
The court granted bail to two accused, Ajeet Kumar Maurya and Kallu (Jitendra Kumar Maurya), charged under IPC sections 352, 115(2), 127(2), 351(3) and SC/ST Act provisions for allegedly assaulting, abusing, and using caste-based slurs against the complainant and his associate. Each accused was released on bail with a bond of ₹25,000, subject to conditions including not leaving the country, not tampering with witnesses, and cooperating with the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
09-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
05-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
03-Feb-2026
Hearing
Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
-
28-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 99/2026
The court granted bail to two accused, Ajeet Kumar Maurya and Kallu (Jitendra Kumar Maurya), charged under IPC sections 352, 115(2), 127(2), 351(3) and SC/ST Act provisions for allegedly assaulting, abusing, and using caste-based slurs against the complainant and his associate. Each accused was released on bail with a bond of ₹25,000, subject to conditions including not leaving the country, not tampering with witnesses, and cooperating with the trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts