Vinod urf Sanoj vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 98/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323.504.506.452.354.. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

BAIL APPLICATION

CNR: UPSN010002862026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

259/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

98/2026

Registration Date

27-01-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323.504.506.452.354.
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1) D DH

Petitioner(s)

Vinod urf Sanoj

Respondent(s)

State of Uttar Pradesh

Hearing History

Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi

01-04-2026

Disposed

30-03-2026

Hearing

23-03-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

12-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
PDF of Bail Order

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Bhadohi, Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the accused Vinod alias Soj in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354 (assault, criminal intimidation, criminal force, house trespass, outraging modesty) and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d,e). The court found that the accused had been on interim bail since January 27, 2026 without misuse, had no criminal history, and considered the case circumstances sufficient to release him on bail with two sureties of ₹50,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Bhadohi, Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the accused Vinod alias Soj in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354 (assault, criminal intimidation, criminal force, house trespass, outraging modesty) and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d,e). The court found that the accused had been on interim bail since January 27, 2026 without misuse, had no criminal history, and considered the case circumstances sufficient to release him on bail with two sureties of ₹50,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case