Vinod urf Sanoj vs State of Uttar Pradesh — 98/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323.504.506.452.354.. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.
BAIL APPLICATION
CNR: UPSN010002862026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
259/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
98/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vinod urf Sanoj
Respondent(s)
State of Uttar Pradesh
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Special Judge SC/ST Pev. of Atrocities Act Bhadohi
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 23-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Bhadohi, Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the accused Vinod alias Soj in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354 (assault, criminal intimidation, criminal force, house trespass, outraging modesty) and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d,e). The court found that the accused had been on interim bail since January 27, 2026 without misuse, had no criminal history, and considered the case circumstances sufficient to release him on bail with two sureties of ₹50,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST Act) at Bhadohi, Uttar Pradesh granted bail to the accused Vinod alias Soj in a case involving charges under IPC sections 323, 504, 506, 452, 354 (assault, criminal intimidation, criminal force, house trespass, outraging modesty) and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(d,e). The court found that the accused had been on interim bail since January 27, 2026 without misuse, had no criminal history, and considered the case circumstances sufficient to release him on bail with two sureties of ₹50,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence and cooperation during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts